<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>AFL Space news and Podcast - Latest Comments</title><link>http://aflspace.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://aflspace.disqus.com/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2011 03:13:41 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: EXCLUSIVE &amp;#8211; Fox Footy &amp;#8211; Is cost devil in the detail?</title><link>http://aflspace.com/2011/11/07/fox-footy-is-cost-devil-in-the-detail/#comment-380153632</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Has there been any announcements on the pricing for the Xbox? I am looking at getting all new, TV/Internet etc contracts.  So the T-Box, Xbox, Foxtel etc are all being considered amongst others like ISP, Internet Tv (FetchTV, Boxee Box, Sony Internet TV) blu ray players etc.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Trevor Smales</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2011 03:13:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: EXCLUSIVE &amp;#8211; Fox Footy &amp;#8211; Is cost devil in the detail?</title><link>http://aflspace.com/2011/11/07/fox-footy-is-cost-devil-in-the-detail/#comment-362689052</link><description>&lt;p&gt;For interest sakes Victor, where you surprised when the deal you signed up for wasn't in HD or do you feel that Foxtel had explained well enough that the $50 plan was SD? If you don't mind me asking, what was the cost difference to go to HD? &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Phillip Molly Malone</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 03:40:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: EXCLUSIVE &amp;#8211; Fox Footy &amp;#8211; Is cost devil in the detail?</title><link>http://aflspace.com/2011/11/07/fox-footy-is-cost-devil-in-the-detail/#comment-361785004</link><description>&lt;p&gt;We signed up for the $50 sports deal recently (initially in SD with the iQHD), but when we got Foxtel HD on Tuesday, it was nothing but brilliant! All sport presented in glorious HD (even in primetime) and I am not looking back. Love my Foxtel and will not cancel my subscription at all. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Victor Yong</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 12 Nov 2011 07:10:19 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: EXCLUSIVE &amp;#8211; Fox Footy &amp;#8211; Is cost devil in the detail?</title><link>http://aflspace.com/2011/11/07/fox-footy-is-cost-devil-in-the-detail/#comment-359023199</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I don't believe that their is HD as such on the T-box. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Phillip Molly Malone</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 09 Nov 2011 03:21:51 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: EXCLUSIVE &amp;#8211; Fox Footy &amp;#8211; Is cost devil in the detail?</title><link>http://aflspace.com/2011/11/07/fox-footy-is-cost-devil-in-the-detail/#comment-359021853</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Will the Fox Footy Channel be in SD or HD on the Telstra T-Box? Cause if there is an option for HD on the T-Box then i will most certainty be getting a T-Box and not Foxtel!!&lt;br&gt; &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Josh</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 09 Nov 2011 03:15:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: EXCLUSIVE &amp;#8211; Fox Footy &amp;#8211; Is cost devil in the detail?</title><link>http://aflspace.com/2011/11/07/fox-footy-is-cost-devil-in-the-detail/#comment-358082141</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I do understand that point of view, as said before, think they are setting up for many customers to be disappointed. Of course, I could be totally wrong. Would be interested if on signup, it is pointed out to customers that the $50 deal is for the Standard Package not HD? I know the add for it makes no mention.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Phillip Molly Malone</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 07 Nov 2011 21:21:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: EXCLUSIVE &amp;#8211; Fox Footy &amp;#8211; Is cost devil in the detail?</title><link>http://aflspace.com/2011/11/07/fox-footy-is-cost-devil-in-the-detail/#comment-358075585</link><description>&lt;p&gt;HD is so much better than SD, but that is just me. &lt;br&gt;What Fox are saying is that if you already have Foxtel HD, you will not pay an extra fee to have Fox Footy. Yes, you have to pay extra to get the HD box, but isn't that obvious. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Henry de Cure</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 07 Nov 2011 21:14:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: EXCLUSIVE &amp;#8211; Fox Footy &amp;#8211; Is cost devil in the detail?</title><link>http://aflspace.com/2011/11/07/fox-footy-is-cost-devil-in-the-detail/#comment-357425990</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Adam,&lt;br&gt;Absolutely. The question is what the cost will be of this. Telstra are still deciding on it. I find it hard to believe it won't either increase the current cost or add an additional cost. The good thing about the T-box is there is no lock in too it. You can decide at anytime to cut it off at no additional charge.&lt;br&gt;HTH&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Phillip Molly Malone</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 07 Nov 2011 07:12:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: EXCLUSIVE &amp;#8211; Fox Footy &amp;#8211; Is cost devil in the detail?</title><link>http://aflspace.com/2011/11/07/fox-footy-is-cost-devil-in-the-detail/#comment-357410758</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Will Fox Footy be available on Tbox?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Adam Jordan</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 07 Nov 2011 06:14:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: EXCLUSIVE &amp;#8211; Fox Footy &amp;#8211; Is cost devil in the detail?</title><link>http://aflspace.com/2011/11/07/fox-footy-is-cost-devil-in-the-detail/#comment-357358000</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Eddie is castor oil for remedying an overdose of Dwayne Russell. In other words, since Clinton Bygrass passed away overuse of the poor-man's Dennis Cometti has had me going for the mute button. When I can I turn onto ABC Radio ... much better than listening to the repetitious Russell and his over use of stats from a computer monitor in the guise of being a wizz of footy facts. And if he says 'party-time' a thousand times more describing a one-sided game I'll scream. No I won't because this is one little black duck to whom I will not be lending my little pinkies ... ever!     &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Gary Shadforth</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 07 Nov 2011 02:45:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: EXCLUSIVE &amp;#8211; Fox Footy &amp;#8211; Is cost devil in the detail?</title><link>http://aflspace.com/2011/11/07/fox-footy-is-cost-devil-in-the-detail/#comment-357354811</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Agreed. Just think that some will be caught out by the difference in the Marketing of the products and what you get.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Phillip Molly Malone</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 07 Nov 2011 02:27:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: EXCLUSIVE &amp;#8211; Fox Footy &amp;#8211; Is cost devil in the detail?</title><link>http://aflspace.com/2011/11/07/fox-footy-is-cost-devil-in-the-detail/#comment-357350067</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The devil is in waiting for the detail once Eddie settles in with his big fat salary.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Gary Shadforth</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 07 Nov 2011 02:03:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: EXCLUSIVE &amp;#8211; Fox Footy &amp;#8211; Is cost devil in the detail?</title><link>http://aflspace.com/2011/11/07/fox-footy-is-cost-devil-in-the-detail/#comment-357342933</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I have the basic and sport for $50 a month (standard IQ), and think it is great. $50 a month for every afl game live. SD is still great quality, and sure HD would be nice, but it aint worth $20 a month. Just get the SD and enjoy every game live on fox.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Chad Leverington</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 07 Nov 2011 01:34:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: AFL Match Review Panel &amp;#8211; Round 23 &amp;#8211; Daisy does Ibbotson (Video)</title><link>http://aflspace.com/2011/08/29/afl-match-review-panel-round-23-daisy-does-ibbotson-video/#comment-297566023</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Yeh about right when you look at that way but 2 &lt;br&gt;weeks is a bit soft - not like he was hurt &amp;amp; then you look at &lt;br&gt;someone like Adam McPhee and he only got one week.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Kick2Kick</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 29 Aug 2011 01:12:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: AFL Match Review Panel &amp;#8211; Round 23 &amp;#8211; Daisy does Ibbotson (Video)</title><link>http://aflspace.com/2011/08/29/afl-match-review-panel-round-23-daisy-does-ibbotson-video/#comment-297564559</link><description>&lt;p&gt;About right I think...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Kick2Kick</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 29 Aug 2011 01:08:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Round Review &amp;#8211; Round 20, 2011 &amp;#8211; 10 Quick Hit Thoughts from the AFL&amp;#8217;s latest round</title><link>http://aflspace.com/2011/08/08/round-review-round-20-2011-10-quick-hit-thoughts-from-the-afls-latest-round/#comment-286996771</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Anyone can see that Port Adelaide have fried their experienced players in 2011. Reasoning we can see: to keep up with GWS AND SUNS. A lot of other teams have older players to lose over the next 2-3 years, and these 3 teams will be knocking on a flag sooner than one thinks. Feel for the experienced players not getting a game. Can't blame them if they go for the draft, hope they do well, after having a year of solid training for NO GAIN&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Bernicon</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 15 Aug 2011 10:38:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Round Review &amp;#8211; Round 18, 2011 &amp;#8211; The Adelaide Woes, Air Walker, and 10 other quick-hit thoughts from Round 18!</title><link>http://aflspace.com/2011/07/25/round-review-round-18-2011-the-adelaide-woes-air-walker-and-10-other-quick-hit-thoughts-from-round-18/#comment-263258609</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Yes watch the Derby Molly, a great close match. Watch Waters in the third when he gets hits and how quick he bounces back up! Classic and no dumb courage there...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Kick2Kick</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 25 Jul 2011 01:28:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Round Review &amp;#8211; Round 18, 2011 &amp;#8211; The Adelaide Woes, Air Walker, and 10 other quick-hit thoughts from Round 18!</title><link>http://aflspace.com/2011/07/25/round-review-round-18-2011-the-adelaide-woes-air-walker-and-10-other-quick-hit-thoughts-from-round-18/#comment-263231517</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Couple of comments. Hawthorn, in many ways, have know right to think we can beat the Cats come September with their list and the losing steak in H&amp;amp;A season games we have against them, but do you think that the Cats would be hoping the Hawks finish 4th with the record we have over Geelong in the Finals? &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I am seriously thinking of sitting down and watching the Derby over this week. Maybe even just the last quarter! &lt;br&gt;Great review! &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Phillip Molly Malone</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 25 Jul 2011 00:37:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: AFL 2011 Power Rankings &amp;#8211; Round 17 &amp;#8211; Switcheroo!</title><link>http://aflspace.com/2011/07/20/afl-2011-power-rankings-round-17-swticheroo/#comment-258459821</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks for the comment Molly. You're right - I could run this exercise myself 10 times and finish up with 10 different results! But, I'm happy with the outcome of feel that most picks make sense (at least in my little world).  On your points:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Tigers: Harry Taylor was a very good call by you here - I keep forgetting he is not very old at all. But, it's hard to go past the midfield silk of Scott Pendlebury at the selection. Agree that Scarlett is far too old for consideration in this process.&lt;br&gt;Suns: I considered a "big" player, but they have Dixon and Lynch (and Gorringe?) down there who are developing quite well. Hence the pick of an established star, in Hodge.&lt;br&gt;Demons: If Travis Cloke was on the board here, I'd agree with you - he may have been a better selection.&lt;br&gt;Sydney: I'm not the biggest fan of Hurley, but I would admit he is going to be a player. I'm happy with his going to Sydney - valuable player.&lt;br&gt;Hawks: Hmm, I think ruck is a weakness down there at Hawthorn, but I don't see Renouf or Bailey close up like you do. You can't tell me you wouldn't want to see Nic Nat put the ball down Sam Mitchell's throat week in, week out!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Cheers mate, and thanks again for the feedback :)&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">luke2177</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 20 Jul 2011 06:38:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: AFL 2011 Power Rankings &amp;#8211; Round 17 &amp;#8211; Switcheroo!</title><link>http://aflspace.com/2011/07/20/afl-2011-power-rankings-round-17-swticheroo/#comment-258014582</link><description>&lt;p&gt;(NOTE: This Comment was written before the correction was added to the Story (i.e. replacing Hibberd with Hurley))&lt;br&gt;Interesting exercise and as was commented to me on my Google Plus sharing of this, you could ask 100 people and 100 different answers. A couple of differences I would consider:&lt;br&gt;Tigers: I would be looking for a key back not another midfielder if I had choice of anyone. Harry Taylor or Ben Reid type. Scarlett bit old for the medium/Long term needs.&lt;br&gt;Suns: As much as you would love Hodge and versitility, need a big forward. Cloke, Daws or maybe Roughead be a better mix in my Opinion&lt;br&gt;Demons: Again, have midfielders out the ears. See Suns for Tall Forward option. Grillor types that can gang and crash and allow Watts and co to do the pretty stuff.&lt;br&gt;Sydney: Again agree with commenter on G+. Hibberd aiming a bit low! Key Forward or CHF would be handy. Maybe Kennedy or Darling&lt;br&gt;Hawks: Assuming everyone on the park, I think great need then ruck or Backman is small forward. With the want (if his body is right) to play Cyril in the guts, need a quick, hardworking small forward. Maybe Lewis Jetta of the Swans (assuming 2 Blues were already taken and couldn't get Garlett). Would even be tempted to trade back Josh Kennedy of the Swans!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Phillip Molly Malone</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2011 21:24:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Round Review &amp;#8211; Round 16, 2011 &amp;#8211; Eagles, Bombers and Carlton&amp;#8217;s top four chances all up in the air!</title><link>http://aflspace.com/2011/07/11/round-review-round-16-2011-eagles-bombers-and-carltons-top-four-chances-all-up-in-the-air/#comment-248597201</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Knew he wouldn't get two weeks. Said that he should though, not that he would. For a leader of an AFL club, what he did was pretty stupid. Should have more sense than that.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dion Bennett</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 12 Jul 2011 01:25:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Round Review &amp;#8211; Round 16, 2011 &amp;#8211; Eagles, Bombers and Carlton&amp;#8217;s top four chances all up in the air!</title><link>http://aflspace.com/2011/07/11/round-review-round-16-2011-eagles-bombers-and-carltons-top-four-chances-all-up-in-the-air/#comment-247446330</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Haven't seen it yet, but for my DreamTeam I hope he avoids a suspension. I support the idea of not enough impact though. I once suggested Micro-points. What I mean is getting like 10 or 20 points for doing something dumb that isn't enough reportable. On its own, not a huge issue but can add up! &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Phillip Molly Malone</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 10 Jul 2011 21:53:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Round Review &amp;#8211; Round 16, 2011 &amp;#8211; Eagles, Bombers and Carlton&amp;#8217;s top four chances all up in the air!</title><link>http://aflspace.com/2011/07/11/round-review-round-16-2011-eagles-bombers-and-carltons-top-four-chances-all-up-in-the-air/#comment-247426938</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Goddard won't get two weeks for his knee to O'Shea. Although intentional conduct (three points) and high contact (three points) the impact was not near sufficient to warrant any MRP action.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Rahul</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 10 Jul 2011 20:53:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: AFL Match Review Panel &amp;#8211; Round 12, 2011 &amp;#8211; Will Slappy Selwood get Slapped? (Video)</title><link>http://aflspace.com/2011/06/13/afl-match-review-panel-round-12-will-slappy-selwood-get-slapped-video/#comment-224628132</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Seems there was enough proof&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Phillip Molly Malone</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 13 Jun 2011 03:06:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: AFL Match Review Panel &amp;#8211; Round 12, 2011 &amp;#8211; Will Slappy Selwood get Slapped? (Video)</title><link>http://aflspace.com/2011/06/13/afl-match-review-panel-round-12-will-slappy-selwood-get-slapped-video/#comment-224627313</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Unsure how you can make a decision based on that! Can you base a suspension just on a medical report?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Kick2Kick</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 13 Jun 2011 03:02:20 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>